Does God Reserve All Judgment UNTIL the End of the Age?
Someone wrote me maintaining that the LORD doesn’t judge anyone during this current church age—whether non-believer, believer or nations—and cited Jesus’ Parable of the Weeds for support. Let’s read the parable in question:
Jesus told them another parable: “The kingdom of heaven is like a man who sowed good seed in his field. (25) But while everyone was sleeping, his enemy came and sowed weeds among the wheat, and went away. (26) When the wheat sprouted and formed heads, then the weeds also appeared.
(27)“The owner’s servants came to him and said, ‘Sir, didn’t you sow good seed in your field? Where then did the weeds come from?’
(28)“ ‘An enemy did this,’ he replied.
“The servants asked him, ‘Do you want us to go and pull them up?’
(29)“ ‘No,’ he answered, ‘because while you are pulling the weeds, you may uproot the wheat with them. (30) Let both grow together until the harvest. At that time I will tell the harvesters: First collect the weeds and tie them in bundles to be burned; then gather the wheat and bring it into my barn.’ ”
Matthew 13:24-30
Here’s Jesus’ explanation a few verses later:
“The one who sowed the good seed is the Son of Man. (38) The field is the world, and the good seed stands for the people of the kingdom. The weeds are the people of the evil one, (39)and the enemy who sows them is the devil. The harvest is the end of the age, and the harvesters are angels.
(40) “As the weeds are pulled up and burned in the fire, so it will be at the end of the age. (41) The Son of Man will send out his angels, and they will weed out of his kingdom everything that causes sin and all who do evil. (42)They will throw them into the blazing furnace, where there will be weeping and gnashing of teeth. (43) Then the righteous will shine like the sun in the kingdom of their Father. Whoever has ears, let them hear.”
Matthew 13:37-43
In light of this parable, the brother argued:
So Jesus is basically telling us that Judgment (of people and nations) is withheld until the end because to judge now would hurt the wheat (the righteous). This is a fundamental principal that Jesus proclaimed.
However, I do believe in the law of sowing & sowing and, as such, see the American Civil War as the USA reaping what it sowed with respect to the horrible sins committed through slavery.
While he’s right about the law of sowing & reaping, he’s wrong about the LORD withholding all judgments until the end of the age. His error can be traced to three hermeneutical infractions:
1. Misapplication
He made the mistake of applying this parable to the entire world when Jesus’ very opening words reveal that he was referring specifically to the Kingdom of God, hence, the church. This is substantiated by Jesus’ explanation in verse 41:
“The Son of Man will send out his angels, and they will weed out of his kingdom everything that causes sin and all who do evil (practice lawlessness).”
Matthew 13:41
Notice Jesus says that the angels will “gather OUT OF HIS KINGDOM” and not “gather out of this world.”
Moreover, the interpretation that the parable applies to the entire world—all races, nations, religions throughout history—would render the story nonsensical. For instance, those who cause sin and do evil have been around in abundance since the time of Cain or before. The field is the world where God has planted something new, His church of “called-out ones” (i.e. genuine believers). The enemy, however, didn’t waste time in planting bad seed in the church. We observe a ready example of this counterfeit seed in the New Testament itself—the churches in Galatia where the Judaizers “bewitched” the believers with their “different gospel” (Galatians 1:6-7 & 3:1-6).
Again, the parable addresses Satan’s attempts to corrupt the church by mingling his children with God’s children, in some cases making it next to impossible to distinguish the true from the false, mostly due to the mask of religiosity; that is, putting on the outward veneer of “Christian” religion without the genuine heart of true Christianity. This is how Judas Iscariot got away with being one of Christ’s twelve disciples for three years, but he inevitably revealed his character. The Pharisees and Teachers of the Law masquerading as godly followers of Judaism are another biblical example.
So the man’s mistake is one of context since the context of the parable makes it clear that Jesus was talking exclusively about THE KINGDOM OF HEAVEN (referred to as the “kingdom of God” in the other three Gospels). We must always remember the hermeneutical rule: “Context is King.”
2. Failing to Interpret Scripture with Scripture
The man also failed to interpret Scripture with Scripture, which is another hermeneutical rule. How did he fail to apply this common-sense rule? He makes the claim that, apart from the law of sowing & reaping, God is withholding all judgment until the end of this age while ignoring several New Testament passages that clearly show otherwise. Let’s look at these passages:
1. Herod Agrippa was king in Israel from 41-44 AD. God showed Herod much patience and mercy even though he was a pompous persecutor of the church, but when he imprisoned Peter and put James to death, as shown in Acts 12:1-5, Herod’s days were numbered and he was dangerously nearing the limit of God’s tolerance (see 1 Thessalonians 2:15-16 to get my drift). When Herod arrogantly accepted praise that was only due the Most High during a political speech he was swiftly wiped off the face of the planet by “an angel of the Lord” (Acts 12:23). What can we make of this? God showed this wicked political ruler much patience and mercy, but when Herod foolishly chose to spurn God’s awesome grace, time after time, the Sovereign Lord withdrew his mercy and decisively executed stern judgment. This occurred in the New Testament era, the “age of grace.”
2. Herod’s judgment & execution was in reference to a political leader, an unbeliever, but there’s also an example of God’s judgment & execution of confessing believers, Ananias and Sapphira:
Now a man named Ananias, together with his wife Sapphira, also sold a piece of property. (2) With his wife’s full knowledge he kept back part of the money for himself, but brought the rest and put it at the apostles’ feet.
(3) Then Peter said, “Ananias, how is it that Satan has so filled your heart that you have lied to the Holy Spirit and have kept for yourself some of the money you received for the land? (4) Didn’t it belong to you before it was sold? And after it was sold, wasn’t the money at your disposal? What made you think of doing such a thing? You have not lied just to human beings but to God.”
(5) When Ananias heard this, he fell down and died. And great fear seized all who heard what had happened. (6) Then some young men came forward, wrapped up his body, and carried him out and buried him.
(7) About three hours later his wife came in, not knowing what had happened. (8) Peter asked her, “Tell me, is this the price you and Ananias got for the land?”
“Yes,” she said, “that is the price.”
(9) Peter said to her, “How could you conspire to test the Spirit of the Lord? Listen! The feet of the men who buried your husband are at the door, and they will carry you out also.”
(10) At that moment she fell down at his feet and died. Then the young men came in and, finding her dead, carried her out and buried her beside her husband. (11) Great fear seized the whole church and all who heard about these events.
Acts 5:1-11
This strict judgment for lying in the midst of the assembly of God resulted in some healthy fear in the church (verse 11). “The fear of the LORD is the beginning of knowledge and wisdom.”
Bear in mind that, as Peter pointed out in verses 3-4, Ananias and Sapphira could’ve done whatever they wanted with the money they got from selling their property. It was their money to do with as they willed. Instead, they wanted people to be wowed with how generous and self-sacrificial they were by saying they were offering the entire amount to the church.
3. Then there’s the judgment that came upon a certain group of Jews who were hindering the spread of the gospel and severely persecuting the church:
For you, brothers and sisters, became imitators of God’s churches in Judea, which are in Christ Jesus: You suffered from your own people the same things those churches suffered from the Jews (15) who killed the Lord Jesus and the prophets and also drove us out. They displease God and are hostile to everyone (16) in their effort to keep us from speaking to the Gentiles so that they may be saved. In this way they always heap up their sins to the limit. The wrath of God has come upon them at last.
1 Thessalonians 2:14-16
These particular Jews displeased God greatly because of their hostile attacks on Christians; hence, Paul says they heaped up their sins “to the limit,” resulting in God’s wrath coming upon them. This suggests that there’s a limit to the LORD’s tolerance of sin, particularly of those who hostilely attack his servants with no care of repentance. Once such people exceed this limit they naturally provoke God’s judgment—in this age. This was the case with aforementioned Herod Agrippa where Herod’s pomp and unjust acts reached the limit of God’s tolerance and thus judgment fell (Acts 12:1-5, 21-23).
This is a consistent theme in Scripture. For instance, in the pre-law era God refused to take the Amorite’s land from them and give it to Abram’s descendants until the sin of the Amorites reached its full measure (Genesis 15:16). This shows that the LORD deals with all people patiently and fairly, whatever the era. Only when the Amorite’s stubbornness and immorality reached the limit of God’s tolerance did judgment fall. Then they were vomited out of the land.
Yes, God is “kind to the ungrateful and wicked,” as Jesus pointed out (Luke 6:35), meaning he is patient and merciful, giving even the worst of sinners repeated opportunities to repent. But when it comes to those who maliciously attack his servants and who refuse to repent even though the ones they attack respond humbly in peace, blessing and prayer, there’s a limit to the LORD’s tolerance. And when God’s mercy is repeatedly spurned His judgment will ultimately fall. Christians “leave room for God’s wrath” by simply walking in love toward their persecutors, which is obedience to the law of overcoming evil with good (Romans 12:19-21). This includes tough love, by the way. Hopefully, malicious individuals will come to repentance, but—if not—God’s wrath will most certainly fall when their sins reach the limit of his merciful tolerance. This was obviously the case with the Judeans in the above passage and Herod, as well as Judas Iscariot, who was “doomed to destruction” (John 17:12).
As far as Judas goes, he was “seized with remorse” after his murderous treason to the point of giving back his blood money and admitting his sin (Matthew 27:3-5), yet this did not indicate repentance. True confession/repentance unlocks God’s forgiveness and brings inner peace. Judas clearly had no such peace and therefore hanged himself. This brings to mind Paul’s contrasting of godly sorrow and worldly sorrow: “Godly sorrow brings repentance that leads to salvation and leaves no regret, but worldly sorrow brings death” (2 Corinthians 7:10). We can conclude that Judas had reached the limit of God’s tolerance; his remorse was too little too late. His heart was hardened by the “deceitfulness of sin” and he had gone beyond the proverbial point of no return. This is a sober lesson to any who would spurn God’s patient mercy and maliciously attack God’s peaceable children with no concern to repent. Keep in mind that those who oppose the church and persecute Christians are, in effect, persecuting the Lord himself (Acts 9:5), not to mention the fact that returning evil for good is a particularly heinous transgression in God’s eyes, as shown in Proverbs 17:13. I fear for such people.
4. Severe judgment came upon a supposed prophetess and her followers at the church of Thyatira. Notice Christ’s stern judgment:
“I have this against you: You tolerate that woman Jezebel, who calls herself a prophet. By her teaching she misleads my servants into sexual immorality and the eating of food sacrificed to idols. (21) I have given her time to repent of her immorality, but she is unwilling. (22) So I will cast her on a bed of suffering, and I will make those who commit adultery with her suffer intensely, unless they repent of her ways. (23) I will strike her children dead. Then all the churches will know that I am he who searches hearts and minds, and I will repay each of you according to your deeds.”
Revelation 2:20-23
Wow, so much for the idea that Jesus Christ is some effeminate milksop. This passage sends those who regard Christ as “gentle Jesus, meek and mild” and nothing more into cardiac shock, LOL.
Despite the Lord’s strict judgment we clearly observe mercy and patience in his words: (1.) He graciously gave “Jezebel” time to repent of her immorality before stern judgment fell, but she was unwilling; and (2.) those who committed adultery with her would “suffer intensely” only if they failed to repent. (“Jezebel” was obviously not her real name, by the way, but rather a symbolic one given by the Lord).
All these biblical examples took place in the New Testament era, the “age of grace,” plainly showing that the idea that God won’t make severe judgments until the end of the age is false.
A Balanced View of God
The main reason I’m sharing this teaching is balance. Some Christians over-emphasize God’s love and mercy to the point that the Almighty’s some cuddly teddy bear in the sky, while others over-emphasize God’s judgment and wrath to the point that He’s some merciless ogre who can’t wait to obliterate humanity. To lean toward one extreme or the other is wrong because God isn’t one or the other.
Observe how a BALANCED believer like Paul acknowledged both sides of God: “Consider therefore the kindness and sternness of God: sternness to those who fell, but kindness to you, provided you continue in his kindness. Otherwise you will be cut off” (Romans 11:22). The LORD was able to use Paul so mightily because he was always BALANCED with what he taught and preached about God. He never swung to one loony extreme or the other.
A General Truth, Not an Absolute Truth
The judgment & execution of Ananias and Sapphira shows that Jesus’ parable about the weeds (or tares) reveals a general truth, not an absolute truth: It’s generally true that judgment of people within the church will wait until the Judgment Seat of Christ or White Throne Judgment, but it’s not absolutely true.*
* You can read about the Judgment Seat of Christ in 2 Corinthians 5:10-11 & Romans 14:10,12, which concerns the judgment of believers; and about the White Throne Judgment in Revelation 20:10-15, which concerns unbelievers. For more on the Judgment Seat of Christ see this article.
Even though Jesus gave instructions on how to discipline unrepentant carnal people in the church (Matthew 18:15-17), some fleshly people are able to elude this due to the mask of religiosity (i.e. legalism) or favor/kinship with church leaders or, sad to say, they may even be church leaders. Hence, their judgment will be put off until the end of the age, generally speaking, which is when Jesus said his angels “will gather OUT OF HIS KINGDOM all who offend and who practice lawlessness, and they will be cast into the furnace of fire,” i.e. the lake of fire (Matthew 13:41-42 & Revelation 20:11-15).
The reason God withholds judgment and allows the “wheat” and the “weeds” to grow together in the kingdom until the end of the age, generally speaking, is to prevent collateral damage in this “present evil age,” as the parable suggests. And also no doubt due to the LORD’s great patience and mercy. “Collateral damage” is more than just loss of lives since any severe judgment has repercussions, both positive and negative.
Why did this man who wrote me ignore all this evidence of God judging gentiles, Jews and confessing believers in the New Testament? Either because he’s unaware of these examples or because they contradict his developed theology. More likely the latter because, after sharing these examples with him, he responded: “Nothing that you have written changes my mind.” My answer: Knowingly ignoring relevant and clear passages is tantamount to cutting them out of the Bible, which is a serious offense according to God’s Word (Deuteronomy 12:32, Proverbs 30:5-6 & Revelation 22:18-19).
3. Reading Too Much Into a Parable, a Symbolic Story
The man’s third error was to read too much into a parable, which is a symbolic story of (usually) mundane things used to convey spiritual truths. For instance, the Parable of the Weeds conveys truths about the establishment of the church, the righteous in Christ (the good seed), the attempts of defilement by the devil and the damning judgment of counterfeits (the weeds) at the end of the age. A simple story of a field, seeds and wheat/weeds could never explicitly convey these truths in the absolute sense, so we naturally look for the general truths the parable conveys and then look to more literal passages in the Scriptures for greater detail.
The man holds this parable and his erroneous interpretation that it refers to the entire world throughout history and not specifically to the kingdom of God during the church age as the doctrinal standard by which the whole of Scripture must submit. As such, he ignores explicit HISTORICAL truth from the New Testament that contradicts his interpretation of truth conveyed in a SYMBOLIC story!
“I Couldn’t Disagree More”
This was what he said in his closing statement, but whether he agreed or disagreed was irrelevant. What matters is what is true based on a balanced, unbiased and thorough study of God’s Word, which is truth, i.e. reality, the way it really is (John 17:17 & 2 Timothy 3:16). Being “unbiased” includes throwing sectarian biases out the window, whatever they may be. Why is it that this is what really matters? Because it’s only THE TRUTH that can set us free. Jesus Christ, who is the truth, plainly said so (John 14:6 & 8:31-32). Erroneous interpretations based on flawed hermeneutics cannot.
Conclusion
The idea that God withholds all judgments until the Judgment Seat of Christ or White Throne Judgment is a false doctrine. This error feeds the common view that God’s just a lovable teddy bear in the sky during the current age of grace—that He would never resort to stern judgment beyond the law of sowing and reaping. The unmistakable passages covered above show otherwise.
Once Saved Always Saved? — Answering the Best Arguments
A couple of people wrote me recently in response to my article Once Saved Always Saved? to defend the popular idea that it is impossible for believers to lose their salvation, even if they walk in sin for years or decades with no concern to repent. This doctrine is known as unconditional eternal security. Since the arguments these people shared with me pretty much represent the best defenses for this position, I’m going to devote an entire article to responding to their arguments and claims, which are cited in red italics below.
Before addressing these arguments it’s necessary to emphasize a number of things, starting with this: The Bible definitely supports the doctrine of eternal security 100%. John 10:28-29 verifies this; however, the Bible clearly does NOT support the doctrine of unconditional eternal security; and this is proven by numerous passages.
I’m very familiar with the topic and my original article wasn’t written rashly. I have zero bias on the issue and am simply going by what the Scriptures teach based on an honest and balanced study. Whatever the truth is, there can be no loopholes; all the “pieces” have to fit. If someone comes up with an argument that ignores multiple biblical passages then that position is dubious at best. Their theology is askew somehow.
I realize there are loads of believers out there who are fervent about their belief in unconditional eternal security, even stubborn; off the top of my head I can think of several people who have either written me or spoken with me seriously on the topic in an attempt to correct. In none of these cases were they able to explain clear passages where the biblical writers warn believers of the “deceptiveness of sin” and the dire consequences of an unrepentant sinful lifestyle and the ensuing falling away, such as:
- Paul (Galatians 5:19-21, 6:7-8 & Romans 11:19-24),
- Peter (2 Peter 2:20-21),
- Christ (Luke 13:1-9, 8:13 & John 15:1-6);
- The writer of Hebrews (Hebrews 10:25-27).
Please look up these passages and reflect on them in your study time; they’re unmistakable. There are several other New Testament passages that illustrate the same, but this is enough for here.
Christ said it’s the truth that will set us free as we continually pursue it, honestly and thoroughly (John 8:31-32); and I’ve been set free on this issue. I’m totally at peace and there’s no temptation for me to go into “attack mode” with people who advocate unconditional eternal security. Nor do I separate from brothers or sisters over the issue, although some might separate from me, but that’s their prerogative. My only concern is what the Scriptures say on the topic and therefore arguments rooted in emotion cannot and will not sway me. You’ll observe that a couple of the arguments below are rooted in emotion rather than what the Scriptures teach. Those who embrace unconditional eternal security have to address the pertinent passages, including the ones noted above. The fact that they won’t testifies against their doctrine.
Why Are Advocates of Unconditional Eternal Security So Fervent and Stubborn About It?
Let’s consider an important question: Why are believers fervent and stubborn on this issue? Here are a few obvious reasons that I can think of:
- Someone they love who’s a confessing believer is living in known sin.
- They themselves are living in sin and are convicted about it.
- Unconditional eternal security is what they were taught in their developing years as a Christian and they’re now rigid on the issue, regardless of the myriad clear passages that contradict what they’ve been taught. Incidentally, Christians who accept or defend doctrines for this reason are decidedly STAGE TWO because they put what their pastor/church/sect advocates above what God’s Word plainly teaches.*
*If you’re not familiar with the Four Stages of spiritual growth go here for details.
Concerning #2, I’ve seen the bad fruit of the doctrine of unconditional eternal security: It naturally cultivates a pompous attitude where believers think they can do whatever fleshly activity they want with zero concern to repent and they’ll never have to answer for it. Or, even if they think they might lose some eternal rewards, their salvation from the second death will never be revoked, even if they live a lifestyle of sin year after year, decade after decade, with zero concern to repent. Frankly, this is an arrogant attitude and God literally opposes the proud (James 4:6 & 1 Peter 5:5). I’ve come across believers who embrace this theology and, without a second thought, will rip-off people hundreds of dollars or more without blinking an eye with no intention of ever making things right.
Or how about the August, 2009, case of George Sodini who walked into a women’s aerobics class near Pittsburgh, turned out the lights, and started shooting into the darkness, firing fifty rounds. Within seconds, he killed three women and wounded nine others. Then he shot and killed himself.
It turned out that he had been planning the killings and his suicide for months in advance. The previous December, he wrote in a blog of the evangelical church he had been attending for thirteen years, saying of the pastor, “This guy teaches (and convinced me) that you can commit mass murder then still go to heaven.” Just one day before his murder spree and suicide, he wrote:
Maybe soon, I will see God and Jesus. At least that is what I was told. Eternal life does NOT depend on works. If it did, we will all be in hell. Christ paid for EVERY sin, so how can I or you be judged BY GOD for a sin when the penalty was ALREADY paid. People judge, but that does not matter. I was reading the Bible and (the book) The Integrity of God beginning yesterday, because soon I will see them.
The book he mentioned, The Integrity of God, was written by an author who advocates that believers cannot forfeit their salvation no matter how much they sin without care of repentance. Apparently the author and the murderer didn’t read Galatians 6:7-8 or Revelation 22:14-15.
This is the wicked fruit of the doctrine of unconditional eternal security. Not only will this man be held thoroughly accountable for his heinous murders, and likely cast into Gehenna (1 John 3:15 settles this), the false teachers who erroneously indoctrinated him will be held accountable as well (2 Corinthians 5:10-11 & 1 Corinthians 3:5-17). Whether or not the latter will also suffer the second death is for God to determine, not me, but it’s a definite possibility in light of 1 Corinthians 3:5-17, which concerns God’s appraisal of the works of ministers. Consider, in particular, the last two verses (which are inextricably linked to the preceding verses):
Don’t you know that you yourselves are God’s temple and that God’s Spirit dwells in your midst? If anyone destroys God’s temple [i.e. the Christian], God will destroy that person; for God’s temple is sacred, and you together are that temple.
1 Corinthians 3:16-17
This is a sobering warning for all Christians, particularly ministers. Paul makes it clear that every believer is “God’s temple;” every Christian is a sacred temple in which the Holy Spirit dwells. Verse 17 solemnly declares that God will destroy any person who destroys this temple. The context is referring to pastors and teachers who destroy Christians with their “wood, hay and straw,” which, represent unbiblical doctrine and fleshly or abusive actions. Many have used verse 17 to preach against smoking and alcohol abuse but the context is plainly referring to ministers whose teachings and actions cause people to fall away from God, in effect destroying God’s temple.
We all know what Paul’s talking about here: A supposed Christian minister whose work ultimately destroys naïve believers and, as such, his (or her) work could be categorized as “wood, hay and straw.” The pastors & teachers who misled George Sodini are an excellent example. Jim Jones and David Koresh are more infamous examples. There are no doubt less extreme cases in your local area.
Notice what verse 17 plainly states God will do to such a pastor or teacher whose work destroys people: “God will destroy him.” This means that God will cut the abusive, hypocritical minister off from salvation and cast him into the lake of fire where he will “destroy both soul and body” (Matthew 10:28).
Speaking of these false teachers, they were around in the first century as well. Jude said: “For certain individuals whose condemnation was written about long ago have secretly slipped in among you. They are ungodly people, who pervert the grace of our God into a license for immorality and deny Jesus Christ our only Sovereign and Lord” (Jude 1:4). Since Jude says that these false grace teachers “secretly slipped in among” the believers we know that they weren’t publicly and verbally denying the Lord, but rather denying Him through their actions and teachings, which corresponds to what Paul taught when he said “They claim to know God, but by their actions they deny him” (Titus 1:16) and Christ as well (Mark 7:6).
Answering the Best Arguments
Okay, let’s address the arguments and claims that have been thrown at me:
I often see Galatians 5:19-21 used to show that “those who do these things will not inherit the kingdom of God” (ESV).
But isn’t that what it says? The version of the Bible quoted is the ESV. The NIV renders verse 21 like so: “those who live like this will not inherit the kingdom of God.” The NASB is even more accurate, being a word-for-word translation: “those who practice such things will not inherit the kingdom of God.” The passage is talking about those who practice sin AS A LIFESTYLE WITHOUT CARE OF REPENTANCE. We know this because 1 John 1:8-9 shows that all genuine believers miss it, but their sins are forgiven as they confess to God; that is, repent.
Is it the fact that they are practicing any of the sins listed the reason that they are not inheriting the kingdom?
Again, it’s because they are practicing works of the flesh with no concern to repent and “the wages of sin is death.” Put another way, the eventual outcome of sin, if one doesn’t turn from it, is death. This explains why John the Baptist instructed people to “produce fruit in keeping with repentance”? (Matthew & Luke 3:8)
Or is it the fact that they are not saved to begin with, and as a result, act the way they do?
While there are “goats” in every congregation (i.e. counterfeits), like Judas as a member of Jesus’ 12 disciples, Paul was addressing BELIEVERS in the region of Galatia. If Paul was addressing unbelievers masquerading as believers then he would’ve qualified his words like so: “Now for those of you who say you’re saved, but are actually unbelievers…”
Think about it: nobody goes to hell based on what they do or do not do
By “hell” you’re of course referring to the lake of fire where damned souls experience the “second death” (Revelation 20:11-15). Why do people have to suffer this “second death”? Because, again, that’s what the wages of sin is – DEATH (Romans 6:23). Moreover, whether people care to admit it or not, there are conditions for receiving God’s gifts of reconciliation and eternal life: (1) REPENTANCE and (2) FAITH. Acts 20:21 verifies this, as does Christ in Mark 1:15. This explains why repentance and faith are the first two basic doctrines of Christianity (Hebrews 6:1-2).* So being cast into the lake of fire and suffering the second death has everything to do with what people do or don’t do.
*For more on the six basic doctrines go here.
for salvation is not by works.
True, it’s not by works; salvation comes through accepting the message of Christ—the gospel—through REPENTANCE and FAITH, which takes humility because arrogant people refuse to admit error and turn from it (i.e. repent); moreover, their arrogance won’t allow them to submit to God’s will. This is why the Bible says three times verbatim that God RESISTS or OPPOSES the proud but gives His FAVOR to the humble (James 4:6, 1 Peter 5:5 and Proverbs 3:34).
Like others who argue that believers can live in unrepentant sin for decades and still be a genuine believer, this man quotes Ephesians 2:8-9 without balancing it out with other pertinent passages. For instance, the very next verse—verse 10—says “For we are God’s handiwork, created in Christ Jesus TO DO GOOD WORKS, which God prepared in advance for us to do.” And then, of course, there’s the long passage from James 2:14-26 where the Holy Spirit says (through James): “faith by itself, if it is not accompanied by action, is dead… As the body without the spirit is dead, so faith without deeds is dead.”
Paul added an important detail when he said that believers are to please God by “bearing fruit in every good work” (Colossians 1:10). He was obviously talking about fruit of the spirit, the main fruit being agape love (Galatians 5:22-23).
What can we conclude from this biblical data? People are saved from the wages of sin—eternal death—by accepting the gospel through humble repentance and faith, not works. However, genuine faith will produce both fruit and works whereas false faith—dead faith—produces neither.
If anyone is going to hell it is because they have not accepted Jesus and therefore have not had eternal life imparted to their spirits.
This is obviously true, but why do they refuse to accept Jesus Christ and receive eternal life? BECAUSE THEY REFUSE TO REPENT. They don’t want to give up this or that sin and submit to the Lord usually because they erroneously think that they will find happiness through their sin, which is impossible. All they’ll find is fleshly satisfaction; underneath is death.
Romans 6:23 says that “the wages of sin is death, but the gift of God is eternal life in Christ Jesus our Lord.” Notice it doesn’t say “The wages of not accepting Jesus Christ is death,” which—while absolutely true (people who reject Christ as Lord will indeed suffer the second death)—it’s not what the passage says. It’s an important point if you reflect on it.
The Bible says that no man shall see the Lord without holiness; but that holiness is provided by Jesus in the new birth and not by our actions.
True, holiness is provided for believers via the new birth. Ephesians 4:22-24 says that our “new self (is) created to be LIKE GOD in true righteousness and holiness.” The passage is referring to the believer’s new nature. However, believers won’t walk in the righteousness and holiness of this new nature UNLESS—as the passage says—we “PUT OFF the old self (the flesh), which is corrupted by deceitful desires and… PUT ON the new self.” So our new nature is indeed created to be like God in true holiness, but we won’t walk in this holiness UNLESS we “put off” the flesh and “put on” the new nature. It’s talking about walking in the spirit, which is what Galatians 5:19-23 is all about.
Paul, by the Holy Spirit, is saying that believers who stubbornly refuse to put off the flesh—i.e. repent of it as necessary—and put on the new self—i.e. live out of their new nature with the help of the Holy Spirit—will be flesh-ruled rather than spirit-controlled and will therefore produce the works of the flesh on a continuing basis. The problem with this is that “those who LIVE LIKE THIS will not inherit the kingdom of God” (verse 21). Why? Because death is the wages of unrepentant sin.
To “live like this” means to walk in sin without care of repentance — i.e. as an ongoing lifestyle. This is why the Bible instructs us to “keep with repentance,” meaning to ‘fess up when we miss it, which releases God to forgive us and cleanse us from all unrighteousness (Matthew & Luke 3:8 and 1 John 1:8-9). If we stubbornly refuse to ‘fess up when we miss it — i.e. repent — then God doesn’t forgive that sin and we’re not cleansed of the corresponding unrighteousness.
Which one of us could ever act holy enough in and of ourselves to merit eternal life?
Holiness comes through spiritual rebirth, but practical holiness comes by learning to put off the flesh and put on the new nature and thus being spirit-controlled. Only then will we bear forth the fruit of the spirit.
And when we start to quantify and measure holiness by our actions legalism is always the result.
As previously noted, the believer is already holy in his or her spirit (which is the only reason the HOLY Spirit can indwell us), but we won’t walk in PRACTICAL HOLINESS unless we “keep in repentance” of the flesh and put on the new self, which is “created to be like God in true righteousness and HOLINESS.”
Can a Christian be carnal and still be saved? The answer is “yes.” To say otherwise violates all of the prohibitions that Paul laid out in his epistles.
Yes, you can be a carnal Christian who practices sin as a lifestyle, but for how long? Why do you think the first word of John the Baptist’s sermon was “REPENT” (Matthew 3:2) and the same with Jesus’ first sermon (Matthew 4:17)? Why did John instruct people to “produce fruit in KEEPING WITH REPENTANCE”? Why did Paul insist that repentance was integral to receiving eternal salvation (Acts 20:21)? Why did Paul write to believers and tell them that anyone who lives in the flesh as a lifestyle with no concern to repent will not inherit the kingdom of God (Galatians 5:19-21 & 1 Corinthians 6:9-11)? Why did Paul emphasize putting off the flesh and its deceitful desires and putting on the new nature (Ephesians 4:22-24)? Why did the apostle John encourage believers to ’fess up if they sinned and receive God’s forgiveness (1 John 1:8-9)? Why did Christ insist that a dubious prophetess and those believers who were misled by her at the church in Asia Minor repent of their immorality? See Revelation 2:20-23.
To repent, by the way, literally means “to change one’s mind” for the positive. This doesn’t mean a meaningless mental exercise, but a change of mind with the corresponding actions, like the revolve to fulfill God’s will (Acts 26:20) and turn from that which is opposed to God’s will, i.e. sin (Acts 8:22 & 2 Corinthians 12:21). Repentance and faith are two sides of the same coin (see Acts 20:21 & Mark 1:15) and so for repentance to be effective it must be combined with faith, otherwise repentance is just a dead exercise. Is it any wonder that repentance and faith are the first two of the six basic doctrines of Christianity? See Hebrews 6:1-2. It is of the utmost importance to one’s spiritual health to grasp this.
Why tell Christians to ‘not lie to one another’? Or to flee fornication? If it were impossible for a Christian to live habitually in these things then Paul wasted his ink.
Obviously because “the wages of sin is DEATH.” In other words, if they practice such sins as a lifestyle with no concern to repent it would eventually cut them off from salvation altogether. Why else do you think “keeping in repentance” is repeatedly stressed in the New Testament in different ways, as noted above?
All Christians—automatically—would repent after the first time and stop doing anything habitually. The Christian life would take care of itself—automatically.
Spiritual growth is a process as the believer learns to be spirit-controlled rather than flesh-ruled. The confess-and-receive-forgiveness dynamic is a key factor in spiritual growth. It keeps our spiritual arteries clear of the clogging-up of unconfessed sin and keeps God’s grace (favor) flowing into our lives. The LORD’s favor flows to the humble—those who keep in repentance—whereas he opposes the arrogant—those who are too proud to confess and repent.
Let me give you a real-life example from the Bible: Remember the unrepentant fornicator from the Corinth church? Because he was stubborn and refused to repent Paul insisted that they put him out of the church (1 Corinthians 5:1-5) and he only instructed them to receive him back when the man humbly repented (2 Corinthians 2:6-11). God’s favor flows to the humble.
It was through this “producing fruit and keeping with repentance” principle that I got freed up from certain sins. It took a while but I eventually got freed-up. This principle kept God’s favor flowing in my life DESPITE regular relapses. This is an example of struggling with sin and eventually learning to walk free, which is different than STUBBORNLY LIVING IN SIN AS A LIFESTYLE. A believer in the former situation doesn’t want to sin, but falls over and over because he’s in bondage whereas the latter individual regularly sins because he wants to sin and has no concern to repent. The latter is in danger of losing his salvation. Don’t get me wrong, God is merciful and gracious, so there is a generous “grace period,” but those who go on in their sin are foolishly mocking God (Galatians 6:7-8). Paul was talking to believers in this passage where he concluded: “Whoever sows to please their flesh, from the flesh will reap DESTRUCTION; whoever sows to please the spirit, from the spirit will reap ETERNAL LIFE.”
How long is this “generous grace period”? The Parable of the Barren Fig Tree gives an idea: Luke 13:5-9, which we’ll address below.
Those who deny the once-saved-always-saved message, like yourself, are calling out those who preach this message and are warning people that this message is dangerously misleading.
It IS dangerously misleading because it deceives believers into thinking they can live a lifestyle of sin without care of repentance and still maintain their salvation year after year, decade after decade. Moreover, it indirectly encourages believers to sin by convincing them that they’re immune to the consequences of sin, something neither Christ nor Paul nor any other biblical writer would do. In fact they did the express opposite (see Mark 9:43-47 & Romans 6:15). Needless to say, the doctrine of unconditional eternal security is a lie straight from the kingdom of darkness!
But in trying to correct what they see as a major problem, they introduce another major problem: salvation by grace through faith and maintained by your works of holiness.
No, salvation is by faith, which is verified by humble repentance (Mark 1:15 & Acts 20:21), and genuine faith results in fruit and works. Our salvation is “maintained” through repentance and faith. After all, if salvation is received via repentance and faith then a person who no longer repents or has faith is no longer saved. It’s simple.
Again, repentance and faith are the two conditions to receiving eternal salvation (Acts 20:21) and therefore believers are required to “keep with repentance” (Matthew 3:8, Luke 3:8 & 1 John 1:8-9) and persevere in faith (Colossians 1:21-23), which explains why repentance and faith are the first two basic doctrines of Christianity (Hebrews 6:1-2). All we have to do is keep with repentance and persevere in faith and there won’t be any problem; salvation is absolutely guaranteed (John 10:27-30). Those who ignore these conditions are fools and do so to their own peril.
This is a greater problem than the one he deals with in his book. And I most definitely am not in agreement with his viewpoint on this matter.
It’s not a matter of what people agree with or don’t agree with; it’s a matter of what God’s Word thoroughly and clearly teaches.
John 5:24 proves that once people are saved it’s not possible for them to lose their salvation
In other words, you think John 5:24 is definitive support for unconditional eternal security. Let’s read the passage and see if this is true (Jesus is speaking):
“Very truly I tell you, whoever hears my word and believes him who sent me has eternal life and will not be judged but has crossed over from death to life.”
John 5:24
Jesus was saying that genuine believers who persevere in faith will not be judged at the White Throne Judgment (Revelation 20:11-15). However, other passages clearly show that all believers must face the Judgment Seat of Christ, also known as the Bema Judgment, which is where “each of us may receive what is due us for the things done while in the body, whether good or bad” (2 Corinthians 5:10-11 & Romans 14:10). *
*See this article on the Judgment Seat of Christ.
In any case, the Messiah was not saying in John 5:24 that it’s impossible for a believer to fall away because, as already detailed, there are numerous crystal clear passages which show that genuine believers can fall away and lose their salvation if they foolishly continue in sin with no care to repent, like 2 Peter 2:20-21 and Hebrews 10:25-27; not to mention what Christ himself taught (e.g. Luke 8:13). We must always be sure to “correctly handle” God’s Word — “rightly divide” it — by being balanced and allow Scripture to interpret Scripture on any given doctrine, including this one (2 Timothy 2:15).
I realize the doctrine of unconditional eternal security is ‘hip’ in Christendom right now, particularly in the Evangelical community (particularly Baptists), but as a minister of God I’m obligated to share the “whole counsel of God” on the topic and not teach something just because it’s currently popular. After all, I’m going to be held accountable for what I teach and I want the LORD to say “Well done good and faithful servant” and not “Why did you mislead people with unbiblical and unbalanced teachings?!”
If our eternity isn’t secured and completed for us, then what is the good news? If I can lose my salvation, then the gospel is NOT good news, but terrible news.
Only terrible news for the fool who chooses to develop a “sinful, unbelieving heart that turns away from the living God” (Hebrews 3:12-13). We’ll look at this passage momentarily.
The good news is that we indeed have eternal security in Christ as we “keep with repentance” and continue in faith. As already established, repentance and faith are the conditions for accepting the gospel (Mark 1:15 & Acts 20:21), which — again — correspond to the first two of the six basic doctrines of Christianity (Hebrews 6:1-2), which you can read about here.
This explains why the Bible stresses “keeping in repentance” (Matthew 3:8, Luke 3:8 & 1 John 1:8-9) and persevering in faith, as Paul pointed out:
He has now reconciled you in His fleshly body through death, in order to present you before Him holy and blameless and beyond reproach—if indeed you continue in the faith firmly established and steadfast, and not moved away from the hope of the gospel
Colossians 1:22-23
As I conveyed in my other article on this topic: If it takes faith to be saved then it naturally follows that someone can’t be saved if they no longer have faith. The Bible teaches that it’s through faith and perseverance that we inherit what is promised, including eternal salvation, not faith for a little bit and then giving up (Hebrews 6:12 & Luke 8:13).
For anyone who argues that there are no conditions to reconciling with God through the gospel then that would mean that everyone is saved or, at least, will be saved, which is universalism, a blatantly false doctrine, proven here.
The fact that some believers fall away because they refuse to keep in repentance and continue in faith does not negate the good news of the gospel for those who obediently comply with these conditions. As long as the believer keeps in repentance and perseveres in faith their salvation is guaranteed. So what’s the problem? There is no problem unless a person is living a lifestyle of sin with no care to repent. The Holy Spirit will always convict such people and move them toward repentance; unfortunately, some will resist the Spirit’s counsel, hardening their hearts further. These types naturally tend to justify their sinful lifestyles and attack those who preach keeping with repentance.
I believe in a God that is the author AND finisher of my faith, and I trust Him that He would never leave my salvation in mine own hands. Now THAT is the good news!
It’s not an issue of what you or I or anyone else believes, it’s a matter of what the Holy Scriptures clearly teach; and, as detailed, they teach that it’s possible for believers to forfeit their salvation due to the deceptiveness of sin and/or not continuing in faith:
See to it, brothers and sisters, that none of you has a sinful, unbelieving heart that turns away from the living God. But encourage one another daily, as long as it is called “Today,” so that none of you may be hardened by sin’s deceitfulness.
Hebrews 3:12-13
Please notice that he’s talking to “brothers and sisters” in the Lord—believers, not unbelievers—and he warns them to be careful not to develop a “sinful, unbelieving heart that turns away from the living God,” which means that it’s possible for believers to develop such a condition. Sin is deceptive. As a person walks in sin it naturally hardens their heart to God and the things of God to the point that they “turn away from the living God.” I’ve seen it happen.
Also notice that a “sinful, unbelieving heart” is the opposite of the two conditions to accepting the gospel—repentance and faith, which (again) correspond to the first two doctrines of basic Christianity.
Obviously believers do have a part to play in their salvation even though Christ is the author and finisher of our faith. If they opt for a “sinful, unbelieving heart that turns away from the living God” this is to their own folly and shame. Paul said that it’s those who persevere in faith who are counted “worthy of the kingdom” (2 Thessalonians 1:4-5) and Jesus also talked about those “who are worthy of taking part in the age to come” (Luke 20:35).
While this may contradict what false grace teachers preach, it’s in accordance with what the Bible plainly teaches.
Colossians 2:13 says that God “forgave ALL our sins” (past tense), which includes our future sins before we even confess them (and even if we DON’T confess them).
This argument sounds valid on the surface; that is, until you look at other clear verses on the topic. As always, “Scripture interprets Scripture” so it’s imperative that we be balanced.
Forgiveness for all sins has been made readily available for all people via Christ’s substitutionary death and resurrection. This is the gospel and explains one of the main reasons why it’s the “good news.” Yet it’s obvious that not everyone has been forgiven by God in light of the fact that multitudes of humanity will be thrown away into the lake of fire to suffer the second death (Revelation 20:11-15). What’s the difference between these people and believers? Simple: Believers procure God’s forgiveness through the conditions of repentance and faith (Acts 20:21 & Mark 1:15), which are the first two basic doctrines of Christianity (Hebrews 6:1-2).
Since God “forgave all our sins,” as pointed out in Colossians 2:13, does that mean believers don’t have to “keep with repentance” by ‘fessing up when we inevitably miss it? No, because that would render numerous other passages superfluous, like the aforementioned Matthew & Luke 3:8 and 1 John 1:8-9. Let’s read the latter passage again:
If we claim to be without sin, we deceive ourselves and the truth is not in us. 9 If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just and will forgive us our sins and purify us from all unrighteousness.
1 John 1:8-9
When people accept the gospel through repentance and faith they appropriate forgiveness for all their past sins. But this passage clearly shows that forgiveness for future sins cannot be procured until after they are committed and confessed. After all, how can you forgive someone for an offense that he or she hasn’t even committed yet?
You see, the Scriptures teach that God deals with us according to our current condition within the context of time. To understand this obvious principle, consider what the LORD Himself said on the matter:
13 “If I tell a righteous person that they will surely live, but then they trust in their righteousness and do evil, none of the righteous things that person has done will be remembered; they will die for the evil they have done. 14 And if I say to a wicked person, ‘You will surely die,’ but they then turn away from their sin and do what is just and right— 15 if they give back what they took in pledge for a loan, return what they have stolen, follow the decrees that give life, and do no evil—that person will surely live; they will not die.” 16 None of the sins that person has committed will be remembered against them. They have done what is just and right; they will surely live.
Ezekiel 33:13-16
As you can see, God holds individuals accountable to their current condition: If a righteous man becomes arrogant and commits evil without care of repentance “none of the righteous things that person has done will be remembered.” By contrast, if a wicked man turns away from evil and does what is just and right “none of the sins that person has committed will be remembered against them.”
Someone might respond: “That’s Old Testament, brother.” But we’re talking about relationship with the God and the Lord is “the same yesterday, today and forever” (Hebrews 13:8). Besides, the same simple relational principle is taught throughout the New Testament — God deals with us according to our current state. This can be observed when the Lord insisted that a dubious prophetess & those misled by her at the church in Thyatira repent of their immorality (Revelation 2:20-23). It is perfectly exemplified in 1 John 1:8-9 above. And the LORD expects us to do the same with others. Let’s consider a few relevant passages.
Earlier we talked about the unrepentant fornicator from the Corinthian church. Because this man was stubborn and refused to repent Paul insisted that the Corinthian believers expel him from their assembly (1 Corinthians 5:1-5). He only instructed that the man be forgiven and received back into the fellowship when he humbly repented (2 Corinthians 2:6-11).
Likewise, notice what Christ said to do when a brother or sister sins against you:
“If your brother or sister sins against you, rebuke them; and if they repent, forgive them. 4 Even if they sin against you seven times in a day and seven times come back to you saying ‘I repent,’ you must forgive them.”
Luke 17:3-4
You see? The Lord instructs us to deal with fellow believers according to their current state. When they repent we are to forgive them, but not before. This is precisely how God deals with us when we sin, as detailed above, and He expects us to treat others accordingly (Ephesians 4:32 & 5:1; and Colossians 3:13). See this article for more data.
I was just reading a book where a minister who supports the doctrine that a believer’s future sins are already forgiven and so we don’t really need to “keep with repentance” in order for God to forgive us when we miss it. He cited this passage for support:
“Their sins and lawless acts
I will remember no more.”Hebrews 10:17
What’s audacious about quoting this particular verse to support this false doctrine is that Hebrews 10 goes on to warn believers of the danger of willfully sinning without care of repentance. Notice for yourself:
26 If we [believers] deliberately keep on sinning after we have received the knowledge of the truth, no sacrifice for sins is left, 27 but only a fearful expectation of judgment and of raging fire that will consume the enemies of God.
Hebrews 10:26-27
To “deliberately keep on sinning” means to willfully sin as a lifestyle without concern of humbly ‘fessing up and procuring God’s forgiveness.
Needless to say, be quick to ‘fess up when you miss it and God will forgive you and cleanse you from all unrighteousness. If the LORD forgives you then please make sure you forgive yourself.
What’s so difficult about this? What’s so hard to understand about it? Nothing. It’s simple as pie: When you morally fail be honest about it with your Lord and repent. ‘Repent’ means to change your mind for the positive. It means making a 180 when you realize you’re going the wrong way. It’s a very positive thing and facilitates closeness in your relationship with God by keeping it honest and preventing your spiritual arteries from the clog-up of unconfessed sin.
How Long Can a Believer Live in Unrepentant Sin Before They’re Cut Off From Salvation?
I want to emphasize that there’s no doubt to God’s great mercy and grace in cases where believers stray into unrepentant sin, particularly in light of Jesus’ Parable of the Vineyard, but in view of the numerous crystal clear passages cited above why risk walking on thin ice by playing around with sin? Some are deceived into thinking they can flirt with the flesh—the deceptive beast within us all—but before they know it they become captive to it. This is the “deceitfulness of sin” noted in Hebrews 3:12-13 (quoted above). Sin has the power to harden a person’s heart to the point where s/he doesn’t want anything to do with God or the things of God.
Now let’s address the aforementioned Parable of the Vineyard, also known as the Parable of the Barren Fig Tree:
5 “…But unless you repent, you too will all perish.”
6Then he told this parable: “A man had a fig tree growing in his vineyard, and he went to look for fruit on it but did not find any. 7So he said to the man who took care of the vineyard, ‘For three years now I’ve been coming to look for fruit on this fig tree and haven’t found any. Cut it down! Why should it use up the soil?’
8“ ‘Sir,’ the man replied, ‘leave it alone for one more year, and I’ll dig around it and fertilize it. 9If it bears fruit next year, fine! If not, then cut it down.’ ”
Luke 13:5-9
Please note Jesus’ preceding statement to giving the parable in verse 5: “unless you repent, you too will all perish.” There is a condition to not perishing—not suffering eternal death—and that condition is to repent. Also notice that Christ holds people responsible for adhering to this condition. God doesn’t force anyone to repent. It’s up to the individual person. God does His part, but we are obligated to do our part. Genuine repentance, by the way isn’t just confessing past sins, but also the resolve to no longer sin and to keep with repentance when we do, as already covered.
The meaning of the parable is obvious:
- The owner of the vineyard represents God;
- the fruitless fig tree represents an individual in covenant with God who’s not bearing fruit;
- and the caretaker represents Jesus, the mediator between the owner and the fig tree.
The owner wants to cut the fig tree down because it hasn’t produced fruit in three years, but the caretaker intercedes and convinces the owner to give the tree one more year wherein the caretaker will do everything he can to get it to be fruitful. If the tree still hasn’t produced fruit by the end of the fourth year the owner and caretaker agree to cut it down and remove it from the vineyard.
What we see here is patience, mercy and grace. The owner of the vineyard and the caretaker, who represent the heavenly Father and Jesus, are willing to give the tree a total of four years to be fruitful before ultimately cutting it down, if they must. The story is figurative so we can’t take it strictly literal, i.e. that God will pluck someone out of the kingdom if they’re fruitless for exactly four years. What we can get from it, however, is that God’s patience, mercy and grace are awesome and He will do everything He can to get us to be fruitful by adhering to the conditions of our covenant, i.e. repentance & faith. He’s invested in us greatly and understandably wants us to be productive.
Another thing we can get from the parable is that when the Lord’s mercy ends His judgment begins and he’ll cut off when/if necessary. Why be foolish and incur such judgment?
Closing Word
Those who rigidly advocate the “once saved always saved” doctrine argue that, if people fall away from the Lord, they were never really saved in the first place. They contend that such people merely dabbled in Christianity and their faith was never really sincere; consequently, any positive changes in their lifestyles were superficial, the result of practicing some Scriptural principles, but not actually knowing the Lord. Surely this is true, but the numerous passages cited above and many others also show that Christians can abort their salvation if they choose to neglect their faith (here are several passages that clearly support this: Galatians 5:19-21, Hebrews 10:25-27, 2 Peter 2:20-21, Romans 11:19-24, 1 Corinthians 6:9-11, Hebrews 3:6, 3:12 & 6:4-6, James 5:19-20, Jude 1:5, Matthew 10:22, Mark 13:13, Luke 8:13 & 13:5-9 and John 15:1-6).
I repeat: If it takes faith to be saved it naturally follows that people cannot be saved if they come to a point where they no longer have faith. That’s simple enough to understand, isn’t it? Let’s not make the issue more complicated than it is.
Suffice to say, don’t play foolish games with God. You can draw whatever conclusion on the matter that gives you peace and helps you sleep at night, just be careful not to play around with “the deceitfulness of sin” or encourage others to do so either. We’re all going to stand before the Lord and give an account one day where “each of us will receive what is due us for the things done while in the body, whether good or bad” (2 Corinthians 5:10-11 & Romans 14:10).
The obvious weakness of the “once saved always saved” teaching is that it can create spiritual complacency, whereas the weakness of the opposite extreme—that believers can lose their salvation at any moment—creates anxiety. Both of these positions are extremes and unscriptural.
The sensible and balanced middle position is that a believer’s salvation is secure as one walks in faith and trusts God’s Word, avoiding both complacency and insecurity. If you miss it, be quick to repent, and God will forgive you. Then keep moving forward knowing that “The path of the righteous is like the first gleam of dawn, shining ever brighter till the full light of day” (Proverbs 4:18). Such people have eternal security in Christ (John 10:27-30). Eternal security is a biblical doctrine, but unconditional eternal security is not. “Do not be deceived” (Galatians 6:7-8).
Related Topics:
Did PAUL’S MESSAGE Contradict Jesus & James’ Gospel?